Anonymous Movie Review

Murder. Sex. Deception. Rebellion. And Shakespeare.

How can you not want to see the movie Anonymous? I mean, really, who doesn't love a good Shakespearian conspiracy theory?


I watched this movie for the first time yesterday afternoon and fell in love with it. Sure, it's a work of fiction. But it's a damn good work of fiction if you ask me.


Premise: Okay, so in real life very little is known about William Shakespeare. We can guess when he was born, we know when he died, we know what his father did for a living (a glove maker) and we know the name of his wife and children. But that's about it. So, this movie takes it into a whole new direction.

This movie claims that the "real" writer of all the plays and sonnets was actually a nobel man raised in a home where writing was thought to be a sin. He is compelled to write, but also compelled to influence the masses with his words. Political manipulation has never been a real intrest of mine, but I was not only hooked but could follow along with this one. The Earl of Oxford, our "real" Shakespeare, does not want James to be the Queen's successor and attempts to not only discredit his foster family (that plays advisor to the Queen) but to reach out to the Queen, the one true love of his life.

   

I really do think that this is a movie worth watching. I will warn you: there is a bit of incest in the movie and at first I was like, "that's totally unbelievable" but the more I thought about it the more I realized it wasn't that unrealistic.

Also, what I found to be the most fun was trying to see the bits of the Earl of Oxford's life that carried into the plays. For instance, there's a character that's a hunchback and the whole time I'm thinking, "Dude, that's like Richard III" and then BAM! We get to Richard III and hello, the appearance of Richard is totally based off the other guy. It was kinda like playing a scavenger hunt with Shakespeare.

Oh, and I totally left something out. Who is William Shakespeare? Well, maybe you should just watch the movie and find out.

Girls Who Read

I feel like this post speaks for itself.

Enjoy!

Divergent Book Review

Alright, I never thought I would jump onto the dystopian train and enjoy the ride. But I have and I do. Granted, my dystopian literature exposure consists of 4 books (The Hunger Games trilogy and now Divergent by Veronica Roth).

I am a big fan of this trilogy already and the second one isn't even published yet.

Why did I like this book? Well, I originally downloaded the free sample on my iPad to see how I'd feel about it. I felt awesome about it. But I had to wait, there were other things on my list I needed to read first. So, I waited and finally, the time came when it was Divergent's turn, and it did not let me down.

I love this society. My blogger friend described the book as being a mashup of Harry Potter sorting hat and Hunger Games. You should totally check out her review here.

But I digress. Let me focus here. Why I liked the book:

1. It was a quick read. I mean, it's over thirty chapters long, but I flew through the novel. HOWEVER, and what I think a strength of Roth's is (or seems to be from her breakout novel) is that not every chapter has to end in a cliff-hanger. That was one thing that drove me crazy with the Hunger Games series. It was like Collins never gave me a chance to breathe and digest what I'd just read. Yes, some cliff-hangers are good, even needed for great books I'd argue, but Roth has a good balance here. 
2. The main character. It was awesome watching her grow and make all these serious decisions. I really don't want to go too in depth with it because then I'd have all these spoilers. But I will say this, unlike Katniss who is swept up by her handful of berries and the implications that that carries, Beatrice (the main character here - aka Tris) knows what she's getting into. 
3. Also, like Hunger Games, the society is divided up. Huger Games had districts that spanned all of a country whereas Divergent has different factions of one society. This society is really limited to one city, and I really want to know what's beyond the farms that lie just outside the city. Is the rest of the world like this? I don't know. If this question isn't answered later in the series then I'll be very disappointed.    
4. Lastly, the thing I think that I loved the most about this book (once I finished) is that while it does leave the reader in some action, the book could stand alone. Let me try and say this a different way. Yes, I want another book in the series, BUT if the series hadn't continued then the book would still be a satisfying read. 

Thing I did not like about the book: It seemed a bit (just a teeny bit) predictable. It was like when you meet a character it's almost like you could figure out their role in the book within a few pages. BUT, she did throw me some curve balls so that's why I say a bit (and not totally) predictable.

Here's how Amazon describes the book: In Beatrice Prior’s dystopian Chicago world, society is divided into five factions, each dedicated to the cultivation of a particular virtue—Candor (the honest), Abnegation (the selfless), Dauntless (the brave), Amity (the peaceful), and Erudite (the intelligent). On an appointed day of every year, all sixteen-year-olds must select the faction to which they will devote the rest of their lives. For Beatrice, the decision is between staying with her family and being who she really is—she can’t have both. So she makes a choice that surprises everyone, including herself.


Oh, and the best part: In the about the author section of the book, it tells me that Divergent was what Roth did in grad school (I think, maybe college) instead of doing her homework. Rock on girl.

Just Keep Swimming

Sometimes I feel as if I have just shot myself in the foot.

I mean, I've loaded the gun. Lined it up with my foot. Pulled the trigger. And POW!

Foot has been shot.

That's how this Harry Potter paper is making me feel. Like, I have all these ideas and plans and evidence from the texts and outside sources and a detailed outline all done. And then I sit down to write the paper and BAM! I run into a wall. I keep looking at my paper and get worried. All I see are quotes that I've strung together, my "original thought" sentences connecting the better phrased quotes together.

Sometimes I feel like I've tricked everybody into thinking I'm all brilliant and everything. Surprise! I'm not! Ugh.

But then I think: No. You can;t have fooled this many people. Not the acceptance board at my graduate school. Not my husband (who can read me like an open book). Not my parents. Not all these amazingly awesome teachers at my grad school. No. There is no way I fooled them all. So then the person I'm fooling has to be myself.

I am brilliant. I can write this damned paper. And it will be awesome.

So sitting here staring at the screen (not writing my paper), I think of some advice that author Ellen Kushner gave me this summer: Get the words on the page. Get a frist draft done. Let it be shit. Let it be a shitty first draft. Because that's what it is: a first draft. You can't fix nothing. If there are no words on the page - you can't refine them. But I can refine shit. I can take a piece of coal and turn it into a diamond.

And then I think of Finding Nemo...




Just insert "writing" for "swimming" and you could have my theme song.

So, what am I going to do?

I'm going to keep swimming. And so should you if you hit that awesome wall of self doubt.

Combo Book Review: The Fault in Our Stars and Going Bovine

Alright, so I read John Green's The Fault in Our Stars and Libba Bray's Going Bovine (actually I read Going Bovine back in January but never got my butt in gear enough to write a review) and I'm now going to do a review and compare/contrast thing here.

I originally thought that since both books feature teenaged narrators who both have fatal diseases, the books might have similar or totally different endings. Well, that's like comparing Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings because they're both third person and fantasy. Kind of a silly thought on my part.

Both of these books are amazingly well written. Bray and Green both excel at humor and at being serious. I mean, the books are about death. Or, being confronted with one's own mortality and learning to live. 

Yes, both main characters Hazel, from Stars, and  Cameron, from Bovine, are teenagers who don't make the most of life. Hazel lets herself get stuck in a rut or limited existence partially because she's dying of lung caner (and thus requires being hooked up to oxygen tanks) and partially because she's depressed and has been away from her peers for three years. The only social interactions she gets are at the community college she attends three times a week, and a support group where all the kids have cancer. It's easy to see how it would be hard to really embrace life to the fullest in that kind of situation. 

Cameron on the other hand doesn't really have a good reason for being a moody loner teenager. For Cameron, it is the disease that gives him life.

Also, I really admire the fact that both narratives are written through the voice of a teenager that is the opposite gender of the writer. I mean, John Green has never been a female teenager (and I have therefore I can be a good judge on the matter), but he pretty much nails the voice in my mind. Now, I've never been a male teenager, and neither has Libba Bray as far as I know, but she as well does an extremely convincing job. 

And that's where the similarities end. Well, they also both have characters who love video games, but I'm not going to linger on that.

So brief reviews on both books...

Going Bovine by Libba Bray

genre: magical realism 

overview: Cameron contracts mad cow disease and teams up with a dwarf, a garden gnome, and an angel to travel cross-country and find a cure while trying to defeat an evil wizard.

I loved loved loved this book. It has been awhile since I read it, but the strengths of it still stick out in my mind. Bray does an amazing job with details. She takes these minor details from before Cameron gets sick and then weaves them into the amazing adventure he has. Like (and I don't consider this a spoiler alert) watch out for snow globes. 

Also, mad cow is not something that you get better from. It's not something you can live with. No. The disease kills you. So you would think the ending of the book would be horribly sad and make you cry for days. And while there are sad parts to it, the book ends on a hopeful note. 

The Fault in Our Stars by John Green 

genre: realistic fiction (but also fantasy in the way that only falling in love for the first time can be)

overview: Hazel has lung cancer and is terminal. She is sleep walking through life, but meeting Augustus Waters gives her a new reason to get out of bed in the morning. 

I adore John Green. He writes characters that I could've been friends with in high school. They just feel like real people. And not just the kids - the parents too. I feel like I'm most like Hazel's mom in this book (she celebrates every holiday. Such as arbor day. It's not goofy. Her child is dying of cancer and the mom wants to make the best of it - who can blame her?)  Also, I'm kind-a in love with the fact that the two main characters (Hazel and Gus') first real conversation revolves around the correct use of the word "literally." You know how that can be a pet peeve of mine.

Does this book end sadly? Yes. The main characters have cancer. To be fair (to them and the world) there is only one way for this book to end. But, is it a book about kids who have cancer? I'd say no. The characters are not defined by their disease. It is a book about kids who are living, not dying.

Here's a video from John Green talking about the novel. 

  

So... where did I think the book was lacking? I feel like the character of Gus (Augustus) at some points is a bit too awesome and a little unrealistic. A super hot guy who is concerned about the metaphor of having an unlit cigarette... and he's 17. So maybe not totally unrealistic but very rare.

But it is totally worth reading. So read it!

Reflections: Harry Potter The End of the Series

At this point I have finished the Harry Potter series, having read nothing else (apart from research) for the most of January and February. I know when I first started I discussed how reading it now was different from reading it when they first came out. I think I have mentioned this before, but I will again. I grew up with Harry. With each new book I was his same age. Harry was a peer and a friend. I found the books amazing and magical (and I sill do, but more on that in a minute). Now, I am different and reading them has been a different experience. So, for this post I thought it might be cool to look at how reading the series has been different this time around, and how it's been the same

Different

1. I mentioned this in an earlier post, but I think that my professor is right; the use of magic in this series is almost too easy. No, don't carry your suitcase when you can just have it levitated up the stairs. Sure, who doesn't want that choice? But I really like the concept of balance in the magical world. Like in the Wizard of Earthsea books... calling upon the storm to stop tossing your boat around the ocean might just cause a horrific storm elsewhere - somehow that balanced approach to magic makes it a bit more believable. 
2. I like a lot more of the "minor" characters now. I say minor in quotation marks because in many ways these characters are not minor ones in the least, but they just aren't major ones. For example: Hagrid (he'll be getting his own post at some point), Ginny, and even Cho. With the exception of Cho, these characters are just amazing. (Cho I hated when I first read the books, now she doesn't bother me at all). Ginny and Hagrid give Harry strength and are just such real and well developed characters - I totally overlooked that the first time through. Sure, I liked them, but now I think I love and respect them.
3. I can't read an entire book in a day. This probably has more to do with me having a job and reading these books for a paper, but once-upon-a-time I could fly through these books with no sleep and just love it.

The Same

1. I still cry at the end of books 5 and 6 and pretty much the entire way through 7. I actually had to stop reading the 7th book at my local Starbucks when I was getting close to the Hedwig bit because I knew I would just start crying - and that would be kinda weird in public. 
2. I still want to go to Hogwarts and study there. I would even consider teaching there. It would be awesome!
3. I still want to be best friends with Harry, Ron, and Hermione OR Sirius, Lupin, and James
4. I still hate Umbridge with a fierce passion and find Lockheart super annoying. I think it's totally because of those two characters that the 2nd and 5th books are my least favorite of the series.
5. And finishing the series is still like saying goodbye to an old friend. It's almost like they've died - sure you can reread the books and relive the memories (like watching old movies and looking at photographs) but these characters will never do anything new again... and that's a bit depression.

I don't know. It's hard to remember just what it was like reading the books for the first time. All I know is that when I was done with one I was hungry for the next which I would devour as soon as I got my hands on it. It's not like that now. I think this time through I was looking more for specific things - things that would support my argument of my paper. I was looking more at Voldemort and how he and Harry would fit into this box I'm trying to build.

I know I won't do it for a while, but I would love to read these books again and just enjoy them. Read them for fun. I have learned in this process that reading a book you love for school can be almost as bad as reading a book you hate for school. I want to read them and pay attention to how Rowling captivates readers of all ages. I want to see how she makes her characters feel so real and have them grow. Those are the kind of riddles of Harry Potter I want to unravel. 

I was going to end my post there, but it just didn't seem right. It seemed as if there was something missing. Something more I wanted to include.... I found this video after I'd written the original version of this post a few weeks ago. Back then I hadn't finished the series yet and wanted to get some ideas out before I lost them. So, right before posting this I found this clip. Sorry for the quality, but I think it's a fantastic note to end on.

Missing: One Blogger/ Creative Writer. Reward if found.

I promise I haven't forgotten about my blog. I know it seems like I have, but there just aren't enough minutes in the day sometimes.

So, what's been going on in my life in the past month?

Well...

I finished my annotated bibliography and detailed outline (which wound up being nine pages long and generated a WOW! from my professor) and got them turned in.

I've started writing the first draft of my paper (wish me luck)...

My life has too much Harry Potter in it... I keep having dreams about it. The one I remember most involves me and my husband being at Hogwarts with Lilly and James and me giving dating advice to Lilly while my husband replaces Wormtail as the fourth member of the group (but doesn't go all evil...)

And I've been sucked into the Hunger Games world. Yes, I saw the movie friday, finished the second book later that night and then finished the third yesterday. Holy cow. I'm pretty sure that sometime this weekend I overdosed on reading... Husband accused me of huffing literature and it's true. I can get addicted to certain books.

Now that I'm done with the Hunger Games I can start having a normal life again, and I'm going to start reading John Green's latest book The Fault in Our Stars. It promises to be good, so hopefully I'll stop being lazy and actually post a book review on that one.

Just wanted to make an appearance... Let you know that I'm not dead (yet). And that there will be more to come.